SpiralWeb Locked
The overall public habitat: a coordination architecture and knowledge commons connecting cafés, fields, protocols, papers, and a forming machine layer.
SpiralWeb uses a developing public vocabulary. This page offers a calm place to orient: what the core terms mean, what layer they belong to, and what they should not be confused with.
These terms describe the habitat as a whole: the public structure, the governance architecture beneath it, and the institutional layer that currently holds the pilot phase.
The overall public habitat: a coordination architecture and knowledge commons connecting cafés, fields, protocols, papers, and a forming machine layer.
The governance and protocol architecture beneath SpiralWeb: a regenerative governance protocol for landscape-scale stewardship.
The legal and institutional container for the pilot phase. This is the formal public layer that holds support, cooperation, and accountability.
A public landing place in SpiralWeb: a place to arrive, understand the tone of a field, and choose how to go further.
These terms help distinguish the relational threshold, the place-based node, and the operational field layer.
The relational and place-based threshold: where SpiralWeb touches ground through local anchoring, trust, continuity, and access to a lived place.
A place-based node in the wider network architecture. Useful as an umbrella term for place-based units across the habitat.
The operational layer: where protocols, observation, work, and evidence are actually in motion.
The human bearer of observation, relationship, and judgment in a place-based track.
A person, group, or constellation with real local grounding and enough relational capacity to carry continuity.
A track with living relationship and/or active field practice.
A track in real preparation, but not yet fully active as field practice.
An open or exploratory track where the right local constellation has not yet been established.
A track open as invitation or renewed dialogue, but not yet stabilized as a field.
A bounded methodological container for action, observation, governance, and review.
The total methodological and governance layer of the habitat.
The upper protocols that define grammar and governance logic across the whole system.
A core domain protocol for domains such as land, water, and air.
A place-specific implementation of kernel logic.
The applied protocol library built around the 13×13 structure.
Steward Regenerative Integration Protocol: the bridge between person, land parcel, and shared measurement logic.
A staircase of activation and maturity.
A stepwise structure in which governance and responsibility mature across layers rather than appearing all at once.
The legibility layer in the PG architecture: a monthly one-page interface between sensing and deciding.
The capacity to make land, people, and governance readable in a shared and disciplined way.
The layer where verified observations become shared reference.
An explicitly defined unit of measurement within protocol logic.
The recurring reading format of the dashboard.
The forming machine-readable layer: JSON schemas, ledgers, structured evidence bundles, and related artifacts.
The system’s measurement grammar: a shared architecture for seeing and acting.
The smallest meaningful observation and stewardship unit.
A multi-level structure in which smaller stewardship units are held within larger circles of coordination.
The three official public support categories in the Association layer.
Support directed toward land, stewardship, and place-based practice.
Support directed toward human, cultural, and knowledge-bearing capacity.
Support directed toward coordination, partner work, and the structures that make the habitat operable.
Support that is intentionally limited and structurally defined: not investment, not ownership, and not donor control.
A support principle meaning that support does not buy returns, ownership, leverage, or control rights.
Ethics understood as capacity in bodies, institutions, and living systems.
Stabilize before expansion.
The economic ethic of the habitat: rotation as care, capacity caps as protection, and anti-hoarding as design principle.